brach

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 390 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Macchiato source code?? Where’d it go? #41070
    brach
    Moderator

    waynemcl,
    Sorry about the trouble…I just sent you an email.
    -Brach

    in reply to: loss of volume #41061
    brach
    Moderator

    That’s exactly what I would expect on R29. Good, there is no continuity across the pins of C18.
    So once you pulled C17, did the pedal start working?
    Are you testing for continuity with the power on or off?…because it should be off.
    If it is true that you are getting continuity across the pins of C17 after it is removed then that is a problem. You must have a solder short across those pins. Please fix it or re-test it for continuity. They should not be connected.
    If you are getting continuity between any 2 pins of the ISP header then there are solder shorts across them or something else in that circuit. See the schematic for more details. You must be doing at least one thing wrong because one of the ISP pins should be connected to ground. Please re-test these pins.
    The main question is did the pedal start working when you pulled C17? If not, check for continuity across those cap pins…fix it if they are shorted. If it did start working after you pulled the cap, then the fet is probably bad or the ISP header has a short across 2 of it’s pins.
    -Brach

    in reply to: loss of volume #41056
    brach
    Moderator

    Peter,
    At least one problem is with the silencing circuit, with R28. If that pin isn’t high (around 5v) then the output will be silenced. Please make sure the isp header pins aren’t shorted. Also make sure C18 isn’t shorted. See if you are getting 5V on one of the pins of R29, as the schematic indicates. If there are no shorts across any of those pins (checked with a multimeter continuity tester) then temporarily remove C17 to see if the shorting circuit is broken (heat up both pins at the same time while gently lifting it off; then use a solder sucker to clean out the holes). It is possible that the FET could have been damaged.
    Don’t worry about the voltage discrepancy on the U2 pin for now.
    Unfortunately, we’ve packed up all these circuit boards into kits, so we don’t have any available to sell by themselves. The good news is that circuit boards are very difficult to damage past the point of repair. If traces are broken, you can always run jumper wires in their place. If pads are lifted, you can always run components point to point or connect them with wires. There’s almost always a way to fix circuit boards…the schematic makes it pretty easy to see where everything goes.
    Let me know what you find.
    -Brach

    in reply to: loss of volume #41010
    brach
    Moderator

    I’m almost positive that nothing got fried.
    Are you saying that it unusually quiet when the effect circuitry is being bypassed and basically off when the effect is engaged until you crank up the volume?
    This is a very common occurrence when there is a bad solder joint in the circuit somewhere. Often times, with bad solder joints, the signal can’t quite get through until the volume is cranked up and the signal has enough power to push through the high resistance of the bad joint. Once it pushes through, it often works for a while (even at lower volumes) but eventually cuts out again. I suggest that you re-flow all the solder joints in the analog part of the circuit, but you might as well do the whole board while you are at it. If there is a bad joint one place, there are likely to be others. When i say “re-flow” what I mean is heating up the joint enough to melt the solder so you can touch the solder wire to it. Not to add more solder, but to add more flux, which is incased in the solder wire. The flux is the stuff that boils and smokes when the solder is heated. It helps the solder flow better and most importantly it seals the joint so oxygen can’t penetrate it and cause it to oxidize. Oxidized joints (aka cold solder joints) become brittle and easily crack.
    This is why the physical shape of the solder joint is important…when the joint is jagged or has irregular blobs on it, the flux can’t flow properly around the joint to seal it (mostly due to capillary action). Properly shaped solder joints allow solder to easily flow and settle on the surface of the joint, which protects it from oxidation.

    Good luck.
    -Brach

    in reply to: Negative feedback (!) #40977
    brach
    Moderator

    I’m so glad you are enjoying your Percolator!
    Those mods sound nice. But I hope you ran a load line on the circuit to see if your transformer is within range to work for it. I don’t know anything about the Defender 5, but I hope that mod isn’t damaging your tube. Another customer tried to change the output transformer on this amp and ended up killing the tube and a resistor or 2. So I’m nervous about customers modding the OPT now, but you sound like you know what you are doing.
    I made the frequency response of this amp a little wider than most amps, to make it sound “fatter” and “bigger” than it really is. After all these years, I can’t remember what frequency cut-offs I used. Most amps I design, I limit the bandwidth to allow it to fit in the mix within the context of a band, so it will cut through the mix better and be heard easier…more mid-range. I didn’t figure the Percolator would be played in any kind of ensemble, but rather in someone’s bedroom by themself where it’s nice to have a wide bandwidth, or in the studio where you can EQ it to fit into your recording.
    -Brach

    in reply to: Negative feedback (!) #40967
    brach
    Moderator

    Good! I’m glad you figured the problem out.
    It’s good to hear you are enjoying it! Hopefully building it and tweaking it was a lot of fun in itself.
    Take care.
    -Brach

    in reply to: No power to pedal, hot C14 #40939
    brach
    Moderator

    I’ve never heard of anyone having those issues before. Did you say that the red power LED is blinking? It’s supposed to just stay on. Are you sure you are not using an AC power supply, or some type of power supply other than what’s specified? It should be 9V DC at least 100mA, center negative. Try a different power supply to just make sure it’s not the problem.
    If the power supply is correct then make sure there are no shorted solder joints in the power supply section (see the schematic for details).
    -Brach

    in reply to: Negative feedback (!) #40931
    brach
    Moderator

    Charles,
    Thanks for your interest in the Percolator. I hope you enjoy building it.
    The NFB loop is connected from the output to the cathode of a previous gain stage via a resistor (you’ll see the schematic when the kit arrives). You are correct, a good way to mod the circuit is to manipulate the NFB loop with either a feedback level control, some tone shaping (via an RC network), or a switch to disconnect it for extra gain in the midrange.
    I’ve done this sort of thing with several different amps in the past, but it’s been so many years now since I designed the Percolator that I can’t remember the specifics of my experiments with it’s NFBL. Feel free to experiment with it yourself!
    Have fun and take care.
    -Brach

    in reply to: MIDI sync recommendations / troubleshooting #40799
    brach
    Moderator

    Mrfurious,
    I’m sorry for your frustration with these syncing issues.
    It seems like you are expecting the Quaverato’s LFO to start at the time you engage the effect. It actually is constantly running in the background from the moment the pedal is powered on. When you engage the effect, you hear it from wherever it is in it’s cycle. That may explain why isn’t not syncing as you expect.
    The midi clock on the Quaverato has never quite been perfect. This is partly due to all the processing the microcontroller is doing, the clock resolution isn’t great. So theoretically, if your computer’s midi clock resolution is better than the Quaverato’s, it’s going to drift (unless you get really lucky). The best way to use it might just be to tap in your tempo and disregard the midi clock sync. I’m sorry about these limitations, but that’s all I can tell you at this point.
    -Brach

    in reply to: VPM-1 Buffered? #40736
    brach
    Moderator

    Yes, the amp output and the tuner out are both buffered.
    -Brach

    in reply to: VPM-1 Unbalanced Estero #40624
    brach
    Moderator

    It’s great to meet another engineer! That’s why I like your communication style!

    Sockets might be nice to have, but I have found them to be unreliable if you are going to be gigging or traveling much with this pedal. But if you really want them then make sure you get the kind that can accommodate short component legs…because the optocouplers that you made now have short legs after you cut them off during assembly. That’s really the only suggestions I have other than use caution when removing the components from the board. They are delicate and the traces and pads on PCB are somewhat delicate too.
    Good luck!
    -Brach

    in reply to: VPM-1 Unbalanced Estero #40616
    brach
    Moderator

    Carlos,
    Thank you very much for the clear and detailed information. It is very easy to work with you in troubleshooting your pedal. I wish all our customers could communicate as well as you.
    That’s no problem about the bags being thrown away. The numbers on the bags might have been helpful to me but it’s not necessary.
    Thank you for the photos you emailed me. The optocouplers look mostly good, but there was one angle that kind of looked like they may need some more sealant. Here’s the edited photo…
    https://zeppelindesignlabs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/20230128_145356.png
    …but if you tested them with your spotlight and they didn’t change resistance then they are probably sealed…but it would be good to be extra cautious in this matter just to rule out all the variables we can.
    When I was designing the VPM-1 I looked into using the NSL-32 optocoupler, but it was hard to get consistent result from them…at least from the batch that I was testing. I ended up spending a couple of months developing my own rigorous test procedure for LDRs that we purchase in bulk. It ended up being way more reliable and economical for us to sort our own LDRs. But in looking at the datasheet for the NSL32SR2 (sorted) variety, they should be matched enough to work with the stereo VPM-1 (any type A-G). That’s assuming the datasheet is correct. I’ve often had a hard time getting the promised results from LDR datasheets in real-life situations. But if you have the sorted variety you can give them a try. It shouldn’t matter which optocoupler goes in which location, if they really do have those specs.
    Good luck!
    -Brach

    in reply to: VPM-1 Unbalanced Estero #40608
    brach
    Moderator

    Carlos,
    Sorry for your stereo trouble.
    First of all let me ask, when your VPM-1 kit came in the mail it should have had 2 pairs of LDRs in the stereo kit bag…did it also have one extra pair in the VPM-1 main kit? If so, which 2 of the 3 pairs did you use? We accidentally sent out 3 pairs of LDRs a few times, which can be confusing.
    Second, did you make sure to change all 7 jumpers when running the stereo setup routine?
    Third, it would help if I can see a picture of the plastic zip lock bags that the stereo LDRs came in. It would help for me to see how the numbers were written on the bags to know what generation of test LDRs were sorted. Could you please send me a photo of them to this address?:
    info “at” zeppelindesignlabs “dot” com
    Forth, it might be good to add some sticky tack (poster putty) on the ends of the optocouplers just to ensure they are really sealed. Sometimes if the holes are too big nail polish won’t seal them. Make sure you run the stereo setup routine again after you do that.
    -Brach

    in reply to: Externalizing dips as pots. #40533
    brach
    Moderator

    Good luck! Let me know how it turns out.
    -Brach

    in reply to: Externalizing dips as pots. #40529
    brach
    Moderator

    The dip switches couldn’t directly be exchanged for pots, but the resistor networks attached to them could be (maybe that’s what you were referring to). You can see from the schematic that the resistors just create a low pass filter and a high pass filter, coupled with C2 and C3. So I suppose you could exchange the resistors for a 50k (or so) pot. You’d probably want to add a minimum resistance to keep the pot from going all the way to 0 ohms.
    It is also possible to exchange the trim pots for external pots, if you wanted. I designed these features to “set and forget”, but if you wanted to play around with them more, I encourage you to experiment. The main issue might be the question of where to mount the pots on the enclosure. I don’t have any suggestions about this, so your guess is as good as mine.
    Good luck.
    -Brach

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 390 total)